previous - reality - further
REA-13 Multiple systems. January 7th, 1986
Multiple systems.
Any criteria can be used to define the members of a LETSystem.
Typical groupings might be geographic, cultural, commercial or
shared interest of any kind.
While the potential number of such groupings in any particular
group of people expands exponentially with the size of that
group, there will be practical limits to the number of LETSystem
memberships that any one person will find it useful to maintain.
Most people will restrict their accounts to two or perhaps three
LETSystems, most likely one serving their local region, one with
activity in the wider region around that locality, and possibly
one or more serving to connect special interest groupings.
The range of services will of course vary from one system to
another, however the major distinction between them will be the
degree to which the member's services are in demand in each, as
this effectively determines his/her spending capacity in each
system.
For people with lower earning capacity, the smaller the system,
the greater the demand for their services.
For people with greater earning power, the larger the system, the
higher the demand, and thus the greater difficulty in disposing
of the earnings.
Both these characteristics work to favour greater levels of
activity in smaller systems than in larger.
The tendency with all operations involving conventional money is
to large scale integration, since the larger the market, the
greater the profit opportunity and therefore the greater the
effect of economies of scale.
This consequence both derives from and accentuates the extraction
of money from the community.
LETSystems support small scale local operations, not by tariff
barriers or artificial subsidies, but simply by providing money
which cannot leave the community and thus maintains demand for
the local product.
This will effortlessly create the decentralised economic
structures which are increasingly recognised to be essential to
our economic and social well-being.
Landsman Community Services Ltd. REA-13 Page 1
REA-13 Multiple systems. January 7th, 1986
Since a critical distinction of LETSystems is the emphasis that
is generated on local interaction and production, it is self-
defeating to chase after the supposed advantages of bigger
systems and unrestricted inter-trading facilities.
While inter-trading must be recognised as an essential part of
the relationship between the organism and its environment,
excessive indulgence in import and export will merely create
a similar condition of dependency and impoverishment to that
established by the cash economy.
This will not be a long-lasting problem, since it will quickly
lead to the demise of the LETSystem in question, or at least, to
a major reduction of its activity, but it should be appreciated
to be an absurd direction.
Notwithstanding the above considerations, there is a clear need
for some mechanism to support trading between communities with a
higher level of sympathy, ethics, practicality, and ecological
realism than is presently provided by conventional monetary
systems.
Landsman will provide the facility for registered LETSystems to
arrange such intertrading through a meta-level LETSystem.
Import-export trades between such communities may be acknowledged
by the recording of credit transfers betweeen the accounts
maintained by each community in the meta-level LETSystem.
In addition to the normal conditions relating to the recording of
acknowledgements, the trading volume that a community will be
allowed to transact in import-export through this exchange will
be initially restricted to a some small fraction of its internal
trading.
Landsman Community Services Ltd. REA-13 Page 2
previous - reality - further