previous - reality - further
REA-12 Taxes. January 8th, 1986
Taxes.
It is true that LETSystems could be used to evade taxation.
However, only the most foolish would dismiss the fact that any
large scale LETSystem will have records as accessible if not more
so than those of conventional banks and other clearing houses.
LETSystems registered with Landsman are required to maintain a
fully legitimate operation, and must clearly advise their members
of the tax (and other) obligations they might incur.
It should be observed that almost all tax evasion is done in
conventional currency.
Is this a good enough reason to argue against its use ?
The use of personal money can in no way be interpreted as a
conflict with normal constitutional arrangements.
Indeed, many who are currently unable, and perhaps unwilling, to
contribute to the upkeep of the state will be far better able to
do their share if the LETSystem provides them with a means to
earn a living.
In addition to supporting revenues to governing bodies,
LETSystems will diminish the level of transfer payments currently
necessary to maintain the viability of the community.
There will be significant reduction of welfare roles and UIC
claims, many job creation schemes will become unnecessary, and
some of the burden on social services will be relieved.
Landsman will continue to invite all levels of government to
consider the advantages to all concerned that will derive from
tax regulations that enable taxes incurred through green dollars
to be paid in green dollars.
Our reading of the current regulations of the Unemployment
Insurance Commission seem to suggest that no distinction can be
made between conventional and green earnings.
Hence green earnings may reduce entitlement in a UIC claim, and
should be reported.
Equally, green earnings are insurable under the same conditions
as cash earnings and may thus generate entitlement.
Landsman Community Services Ltd. REA-12 Page 1
REA-12 Taxes. January 8th, 1986
We hope that it will be quickly recognised that LETSystems
provide the opportunity for all to work as they wish, and thus
represent a major alternative to the current dependency of many
upon the UIC program.
This suggests that it would be good policy to dissociate green
dollars entirely from all UIC procedures.
It is a typical provision of welfare and other social assistance
programs that earnings automatically reduce entitlement.
The consequence of this provision is the so-called Poverty Trap.
Green dollars offer an opportunity for government to help people
out of this trap without being stuck with the expense.
For some time, green dollars will be only partially applicable to
expenditure on those necessities that welfare programs are
intended to assure.
Hence earnings in green should only reduce entitlement to the
extent that actual expenditure on those necessities is possible.
This will allow people to increase their earnings, their well-
being and self respect, without an equal loss of support.
It is likely, in most circumstances, that such concessions will
need to be won.
Those who are given the heavy responsibility of supporting those
in need have often acquired a reputation for insensitivity,
arrogance and limited imagination.
If a battle is indeed necessary, the field must be carefully
chosen.
It is probably preferable that these issues are approached in
communities where strong support already exists amongst
claimants, and media coverage is likely.
All these matters are concerned with the relationship between the
person and the state, and particularly address decentralization
of authority.
Each aspect has differing significance at the federal, provincial
and local level of government.
The interplay of the various interests will provide political
theatre of the highest degree.
Landsman Community Services Ltd. REA-12 Page 2
previous - reality - further